Home - IFSP.cz

Main articles

Search in posts

14. 6. 2026

New article in the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Our study, which proposes improvements to decision-making in legal capacity cases, has been published.

We focused on a question that may seem minor, but is in fact crucial: how courts ask expert witnesses questions. Because the quality of the answer often depends on the quality of the question.

Based on actual court orders from two judicial regions, we conducted a qualitative cluster analysis in which we identified semantic groups of expert questions and their superordinate categories.

After comparing what the judiciary actually needs from experts, we were able to implement the main idea: to reformulate the wording of questions so that they do not prompt experts to provide “is / is not capable” type answers. Such questions tend to lead to categorical conclusions in expert opinions, which may sometimes encourage the court to adopt them as the basis for subsequent decisions.

Judges are human, too. Research on cognitive biases in legal decision-making has long shown that the way a problem is framed can influence subsequent judgments and decisions, including through framing and anchoring. This issue is also well known from Tversky and Kahneman’s classic study on decision-making under framing.

In other words, if a question is posed in a way that leads the expert toward a categorical answer, there is a risk that the court’s attention will be focused more on accepting the resulting conclusion than on independently assessing the description of the person’s abilities, limitations, and actual functioning.

By contrast, questions that encourage experts to describe the person’s condition and functioning enable the court to form a qualified understanding of the person’s abilities, limitations, need for support, and real-life context. This is crucial in legal capacity cases, because such decisions are intended to protect the person, while at the same time they may significantly interfere with their autonomy and rights.

Link to our study here.

7. 6. 2026

Rozpleteno: Lov na osamělá srdce (Unraveled: The Hunt for Lonely Hearts)

On 9 June 2026, Zuzana Piussi’s report Rozpleteno: Lov na osamělá srdce (Unraveled: The Hunt for Lonely Hearts) will be broadcast. The report addresses the issue of online romance scams, which are based on exploiting emotions, trust, the desire for closeness, and feelings of loneliness.

A romance scam is not merely a financial fraud. It is a form of emotional manipulation that can affect even an educated and cautious person — especially at a time when they feel alone. Dr. Jiří Závora, a member of our institute, also appears in the report on this topic.

27. 5. 2026

“Justice? The Czech Judicial System and Its Controversial Cases”

Dr. Jiří Závora, a member of our Institute, spoke at the Chamber of Deputies as part of the seminar “Justice? The Czech Judicial System and Its Controversial Cases,” organized by the Šalamoun Association.

His presentation, titled “Expert Opinions and Their Reviewability,” addressed the systemic rationale for the reviewability of expert opinions in the context of judicial excesses and controversial cases within the Czech justice system. Link to the recording here.

1. 4. 2026

General Advisory Board for Expert Activities

On April 1, 2026, the first meeting of the General Advisory Board for Expert Activities was held at the Ministry of Justice. This new board brings together the chairs of the Ministry’s eight advisory boards and is intended to serve as a common platform for addressing issues related to expert activities across different fields.

The General Advisory Board is chaired by Assoc. Prof. Ing. JUDr. Zdeněk Dufek, Ph.D. The board also includes a member of our institute, PhDr. Jiří Závora, Ph.D. et Ph.D., who serves as Chair of the Advisory Board for the Methodology of Forensic Disciplines.

The establishment of this board represents an important step toward closer cooperation between the Ministry of Justice and the expert community. From our institute’s perspective, it is particularly significant that the topics under consideration also include the methodological aspects of expert activities, namely issues of quality, reviewability, and the professional structure of expert conclusions.

21.-22. 5. 2026

Two-Day “Matriky 2026” Seminar in Hradec Králové

Last week, a member of our Institute, Mgr. Vojtěch Skořepa, gave a short expert presentation on vidimace — the certification of copies. The response and the subsequent discussion were very strong. Key message: in practice, the greatest risk is often not a lack of knowledge, but routine and automatic habits. We thank the organizers for the invitation and all participants for their energy and questions. If you are interested in workshop-based training focused on practical application, please contact us.

5.-6. 5. 2026

Examination of Mental State in Criminal Proceedings

Dr. Jiří Závora served as a lecturer at a Judicial Academy seminar for judges and prosecutors on the examination of mental state in criminal proceedings. The seminar was conducted as a panel discussion, replacing the traditional lecture format. The other speakers were prominent figures in the fields of law and expert evidence: Dr. Katarína Tejnská and Dr. Jiří Pleva (NSZ), Dr. Jiří Říha (NS), and Dr. Marek Páv (PN Bohnice).

1. 5. 2026

Zuzana Piussi’s report Rozpleteno: Diagnóza nepohodlný (Unravelled: The Inconvenient Diagnosis)

Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization represents an exceptionally serious intrusion into a person’s life. This makes the question of the quality of the expert reports on which courts base their decisions in such cases all the more important.

Zuzana Piussi’s report Rozpleteno: Diagnóza nepohodlný (Unravelled: The Inconvenient Diagnosis), broadcast on ČT1, addresses precisely this issue — the quality of expert reports in cases of involuntary psychiatric hospitalization. Dr. Jiří Závora, a member of our institute, also appears in the report.

16. 3. 2026

A Charles University Micro-credential for the Preparation of Future Expert Witnesses in Clinical and Non-clinical Psychology

We are delighted. Today, the study programme of the first doctoral-level micro-credential at Charles University, for which Dr. Jiří Závora serves as the academic guarantor, was approved.

The programme is focused on the systematic preparation of future expert witnesses in both clinical and non-clinical psychology.

The programme was developed by Dr. Závora together with Dr. Michalec from the Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Dr. Richter from the Faculty of Law, Charles University, and Dr. Páv from the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University. Its structure corresponds to the expert witness procedure under the new regulations governing expert activities.

Graduates of the micro-credential programme will acquire epistemic competence, that is, the ability to substantiate expert conclusions. We firmly believe that this will improve the quality of expert work in our field.

4. 3. 2026

A Training Session on the Expert Witness Procedure at BDO

Dr. Jiří Závora delivered a training session at BDO on the expert witness procedure. This follows the workshops we have been organizing for attorneys for the second year. While we teach attorneys to read expert reports from the conclusions back to the sources, we teach expert witnesses to build their reports from the data sources upward. The atmosphere at BDO was excellent, and Dr. Lukáš Křístek contributed to it greatly, both personally and professionally.

25. 2. 2026

A Professional Dialogue with AZO Experts

On 25 February 2026, a professional dialogue with AZO experts took place in Brno, focusing on questions submitted in advance by the participants. Dr. Jiří Závora, a member of our institute, was among those responding to the questions. This format made it possible to address directly the practical issues that repeatedly arise in expert practice. A brief vertical analysis of the experts’ questions revealed four common layers:

First level: normative correctness versus “the client’s wishes”. In practice, a simple but fundamental question keeps returning: in a private engagement, can a client request that something be included or omitted when the legal framework for a given type of valuation requires it?

Second level: methodological transparency of the expert report. It is not about the length of the text, but about the architecture of the expert’s procedure—what exactly belongs in the sections describing the selection of sources, data collection and processing, analysis and results, interpretation, and the checking/verification of the procedure.

Third level: defending the expert in an adversarial environment. Today, experts often act not only as specialists, but also as “witnesses to methodology”: they must be able to respond to questions that are substantively empty, deliberately confusing, or demeaning.

Fourth level: professional strategy and the future of the field. The dilemma faced by early-career experts—narrow specialization versus a broader remit—reappears, compounded by the prospect of digitization in construction (BIM) and by the question of what an experienced expert would do differently today if they were starting over.

21. 1. 2026

Workshop “Expert Opinion as Evidence”

On 21 January, we held another workshop titled “Expert Opinion as Evidence” for attorneys and trainee attorneys. Dr. Závora demonstrated how to evaluate expert reports effectively and what questions to ask expert witnesses to prompt them to document the methodology by which they reached their conclusions. The atmosphere was excellent, although many participants expressed strong skepticism based on their experience with courts taking an indifferent approach to the review of expert evidence. We also welcomed representatives of the Šalamoun association—Václav Peričevič and film director Zuzana Piussi—whose documentary Pachová stopa (Scent Trail) highlights shortcomings in forensic odorology reports. Reports in this field are a typical example of the broader failure—by experts and by the justice system alike—to require and provide a documented, step-by-step reasoning process for resolving technical questions. It must be noted that unless Czech courts insist on detailed justification of each step taken by expert witnesses, the reliability of expert conclusions cannot be assured.

4.-5. 12. 2025

The 46th Czech–Slovak Conference on Forensic Psychiatry

At the beginning of December, the traditional 46th Czech-Slovak Forensic Psychiatry Conference took place at Bohnice Psychiatric Hospital, in the main hall of the Divadlo za plotem theatre. Dr. Jiří Závora chaired the section “Expert Report and Its Reviewability”. Together with JUDr. Jiří Pleva, Ph.D., from the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office, and MUDr. Marek Páv, Ph.D., MBA, Chair of the Forensic Psychiatry Section of the Psychiatric Society of the Czech Medical Society of J. E. Purkyně (ČLS JEP), they discussed what it means for expert reports addressing the (non-)criminal responsibility of perpetrators of serious crimes to be reviewable. The central message of this section was an appeal for forensic psychiatrists to document the entire process of solving the expert question (analytical procedure) so that expert reports are reviewable—i.e., so that the court can rely on the conclusion as not merely the expert’s assertion or impression, but as the reliably documented outcome of a thorough examination. Current Czech legislation governing expert activities imposes an obligation on experts to document their entire procedure (Sections 52–58 of Decree No. 503/2020 Coll.), enabling each step of the expert’s process to be reviewed, the evidential basis of the conclusions to be verified, and, in many cases, exceptionally serious consequences arising from erroneous expert conclusions to be avoided.

5. 12. 2025

“False evidence for 30 crowns, experiment shows. Most authorities failed”

Seznam Zprávy reacts to our experiment, in which we repeatedly tested the error rate in the official certification of copies of documents (vidimace). Just as in 2017, the authorities in 2024 showed an enormous error rate, and it is therefore still possible, even after seven years, to obtain fake “evidence” for 30 crowns. Unlike the results from 2017, last year’s experiment is specific in that it presents “The Story of Vidimace in the Czech Republic” – a portrayal of the hard-to-grasp attitude not only of front-line officials to vidimace, but unfortunately also of supervisory authorities. Officials underestimate vidimace and consider it insignificant in terms of its possible consequences, and supervisory authorities are completely indifferent to the whole issue. The worst stance was taken by the Chamber of Notaries, as expressed by its president, Mgr. Neubauer. It may be understandable that officials and supervisory authorities are unable to fully foresee the serious consequences of incorrect vidimace, as these require the specialist expertise of court experts in the fields of document examination and handwriting identification. Nevertheless, we already familiarised the supervisory authorities with this issue in detail in 2017. Their attitude has not changed and the error rate remains extraordinarily high. Since 2017, we have amassed extensive correspondence with all supervisory institutions, which shows that no one is interested in a systemic solution to vidimace. And because we are convinced that this is a systemic problem, we have not published the names of the authorities that made mistakes in both experiments, as we consider that unfair. In practice, it would merely turn them into scapegoats for a large number of authorities that would also make mistakes if we were to test the error rate in vidimace nationwide. You can read the full article about our experiment and the subsequent response from the state administration here.

28. 11. 2025

Where is the expert-witness system headed? Dr. Závora at the Ombudsman’s Office conference

On 28 November 2025, the conference “Where is the expert-witness system headed?” was held in the large Otakar Motejl conference hall in Brno, organised by the Office of the Public Defender of Rights and the Defender of Children’s Rights under the auspices of the Deputy Public Defender, JUDr. Vít Alexander Schorm. PhDr. Jiří Závora, Ph.D. et Ph.D., a member of our institute delivered a paper entitled “From conclusions to terms of reference: what are we actually reviewing?” as part of a panel focused on the experiences of the professional community with expert reports.

The conference followed up on the findings of the Ombudsman’s Office that the expert-witness system has serious flaws and faces systemic problems – from a shortage of experts in key fields to poor-quality reports and the absence of uniform standards for expert work. It is telling that, at the very time of the conference, a heated dispute was already under way between the Ombudsman’s Office and the Ministry of Justice, which refused to provide the Deputy Ombudsman with information on how it supervises court-appointed experts and conducts administrative offence proceedings against them, even though the Ministry itself is required by law to ensure the quality of expert work.

Publicly available information shows that the Deputy Ombudsman has, among other things, drawn attention to the case of an expert who produced an average of one report per day, and to concerns that ministerial supervision of experts is random, non-transparent and often impossible to review, even for the experts themselves. In a situation where expert reports determine the removal of a child from parental care, the restriction of legal capacity or detention in a psychiatric facility, we consider it unacceptable that it is not possible to independently verify how the state manages these risks.

IFSP has long focused on the reviewability of expert reports and on structuring the expert’s work “from conclusions back to sources”. In this context, we fully endorse the demand formulated by the Deputy Ombudsman in his press release “The expert-witness system has serious flaws. The Deputy Ombudsman is therefore launching an investigation”, which we recommend to readers as a key reference text.

11. 11. 2025

Seminar “Forensic evaluation of mental state”

Dr. Jiří Závora, a member of our institute, participated as a lecturer in a professional seminar organized by the Judicial Academy entitled “Forensic evaluation of mental state”. Together with other experts—Dr. Jiří Michalec, Dr. Marek Páv, Dr. Jiří Pleva, Dr. Martin Richter, Dr. Jiří Říha, and Dr. Katarína Tejnská—he led a panel discussion that replaced the traditional lecture format. The discussion focused on the examination of mental state in criminal proceedings and new regulations governing expert activities.

10. 11. 2025

Sexological expert opinion

A monograph by the renowned Czech sexologist Dr. Brichcín was published, with contributions from Dr. Závora, a member of our institute, in the chapter devoted to expert opinions: Páv, M., & Závora, J. (2025). Sexuologický znalecký posudek. In S. Brichcín, Soudní sexuologie. Grada

29. 10. 2025

Forensic psychiatric study – Gender Disparities in Czech Forensic Psychiatric Inpatient Care

A member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, participated in a unique forensic psychiatric study by MUDr. Marek Páv, Ph.D.: 14 CZ facilities (n=838). Significant differences between women and men: length of stay 893 vs. 1358 days, different diagnoses, different medication, significant differences in unmet needs of women: relationships, self-care, housing, work.

13. 10. 2025

Gender Disparities in Czech Forensic Psychiatric Inpatient Care

A member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, is the co-author of an article that has been accepted for publication in the scientific journal Frontiers in Psychiatry. The study examines gender differences in needs in Czech forensic psychiatric inpatient care during short-term stays. The research included 85 women and 753 men from 14 forensic psychiatric facilities in the Czech Republic.

16.-18. 6. 2025

European Council for High Ability (ECHA) Conference in Karlstad

A friendly atmosphere and plenty of opportunities to share the results of one’s own research – that was ECHA 2025 in Karlstad. “The organisers obviously aimed to encourage PhD students and emerging researchers to contribute to and gain as much as possible from the conference – they arranged a workshop for us, mingled with us in the audience, and showed genuine interest in the details of our projects. During the poster session, Prof Tracy Riley, a keynote speaker from New Zealand, stopped by and immediately and openly started talking about what she had enjoyed about my oral presentation. The chair of the organising committee, Prof Valerie Margrain, came up asking if we had already published the results and suggested several suitable journals,” says Jana.

16.-18. 6. 2025

European Council for High Ability (ECHA) and International group for Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness (IgMCG) conference

In mid-June, combined European Council for High Ability (ECHA) and International group for Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness (IgMCG) conference was held in Karlstad, Sweden. On this occasion, Mgr. Jana Pleskotová presented a case study exploring the experience of gifted teenagers attending mainstream lower-secondary schools. The results of the research, co-authored by a member of our institute, Mgr. Hana Sirotková, attracted a relatively wide audience and became the subject of interesting discussions enriched by an international context.

20. 6. 2025

Analysing length of stay disparities in inpatient forensic psychiatric care: A cross-sectional study in Czechia

A member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, is co-author of an article published in the International Journal of Mental Health Systems. The study deals with the length of stay in inpatient forensic psychiatric care in the Czech Republic. It is a study on a cohort of 765 patients from the 8 largest hospitals in the Czech Republic. Differences between hospitals were found, differences related to the type of diagnosis as well as lengthening or shortening of length of stay depending on the type of treatment.

22. 5. 2025

RESULTS OF THE VIDIMATION EXPERIMENT

In 2017, we conducted an experiment to test the quality of the verification. The results were shocking. Offices verified the forgery in 77 % of the cases! We repeated the experiment in June 2024. We wanted to give the time to improve. The offies did, but not very significantly. In the second experiment, the forgery was verified 60 % of the time!

To educate the public about the danger behind such a high error rate, we created a series of illustrative videos called The Czech verification way. We will also be publishing an expert article in a scientific journal. Last but not least, we will inform the public through the media.

15. 4. 2025

Methodology for evaluation of attestation case studies of future clinical psychologist

The procedure of the expert, which is, according to the proposal of a member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, the principle concept of reviewability of expert opinions in the new legal regulation of expert activities, has been newly implemented also in the Methodology for the evaluation of attestation case studies of future clinical psychologists. Dr. Závora participated in this methodology as a consultant. Future experts in the field of clinical psychology will thus learn the procedure of an expert already in their pre-attestation training. It is expected not only to improve the general quality of the practice of clinical psychologists in the Czech Republic, but also to improve the work of future experts in this extremely important branch of justice. The prism of the expert’s procedure will clarify the justification of the choice of diagnostic methods and their lege artis application.

31. 3. 2025

Workshop for law firm

A member of our Institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, trained the litigation team of one of the leading Czech law firms, PRK Partners, s.r.o. The subject of the interpretation was the expert’s procedure according to the new regulation of expert activity in relation to the reviewability of the expert’s report.

19. 2. 2025

Unique study on the causes of juvenile delinquency – girl

Members of our institute, Dr. Závora and Mgr. Skořepa, are co-authors of a recently published study in an impacted scientific periodical.

This is a unique qualitative research study that examines the experiences of adolescents from otherwise functional families and environments who nevertheless engage in delinquent behavior. The most difficult part of this research has been to locate these extremely specific cases (boys and girls) and to understand this specific experience.

15. 2. 2025

EXPERT STAMP – 6. Conclusion

We have published the last episode of our podcast Expert Stamp, in which we focused on another part of the expert report “Conclusion”.

You can listen to the new episode on our Spotify and YouTube.

12. 2. 2025

Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children

IFSP member, Mgr. Hana Sirotková, collaborated on the Czech adaptation of the 5th version of the Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children (WISC-V^uk). The author of the Czech adaptation of this test is Dr. Dana Krejčířová. It is an important diagnostic tool that has been waiting for its update for a long time.

7. 2. 2025

Workshop: Expert opinion as evidence

On Friday, we trained attorneys in a practical workshop on: Expert opinion as evidence. The workshop had a very constructive atmosphere in which the rich experience of the attorneys was shared. Dr. Zavora explained the difference between an expert’s procedure and a report on that procedure, by which the expert demonstrates how he or she has solved the expert question.

27. 1. 2025

EXPERT STAMP – 5. Justification

We have published the 5th episode of our podcast Expert Stamp, in which we focused on another element of the expert report, “Justification”.

You can listen to the new episode on our Spotify and YouTube.

20. 1. 2025

Expert Forensic Science

A member of our institute, Mgr. Bohdana Nováková, gave an invited lecture at the Expert Forensic Science conference held on 21-22 January in Mikulov. She presented the procedure of a forensic expert from the perspective of a lawyer.

2. 1. 2025

EXPERT STAMP – 4. Opinion

We have published the 4. episode of our podcast Expert Stamp, in which we focused on another part of the expert report “Opinion”.

You can listen to the new episode on our Spotify and YouTube.

21. 12. 2024

A unique study on the causes of juvenile delinquency

Members of our institute, Dr. Závora and Mgr. Skořepa, are co-authors of a study accepted by an impacted scientific periodical.
The study deals with a case of delinquent behaviour of an adolescent girl in whom the usual causes of such behaviour are not present. This is a long-term project of our institute to publish two thematically similar case studies (a boy and a girl). In this case, the second study is of a girl who committed multiple thefts. This is unique qualitative research that explores the experiences of children from otherwise functional families and environments who nevertheless commit large-scale delinquent acts. The most difficult part of this project was finding juvenile delinquent who come from functional families.

18. 12. 2024

EXPERT STAMP – 3. Data collection

We have published the 3rd episode of our podcast Expert Stamp, in which we focused on another element of the expert report “Data collection”.

You can listen to the new episode on our Spotify and YouTube.

29. 11. 2024

Podcast recording Expert Stamp

The next episodes of the Expert Stamp podcast have been recorded. Dr. Závora together with doc. Dufek and dr. Dřínovský from FAST VUT and doc. Krabec from VŠE, they explain the next steps of the expert procedure, based on their experiences from examinations of candidates for registration in the list of experts. The podcast may also be useful for already appointed experts, attorneys, judges, etc.

22. 11. 2024

EXPERT STAMP – 2. Data sources

We have published Part 2 of our Expert Stamp podcast, in which we discuss the requirement for “data sources” in the expert report.

You can listen to this episode on our Spotify and YouTube.

7. 11. 2024

Wo rkshop: Expert opinion as evidence (from the lawyer´s poin of view)

We have prepared a seminar in which we will explain the compulsory procedure of the expert to attorneys and law clerks. Participants will undergo practical training in which they will acquire the ability to recognize the deficiencies of an expert’s report that prevent its reviewability.
The seminar will be led by a member of our Institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, the author of the expert’s procedure in the new regulation of expert activities.

20. 10. 2024

EXPERT STAMP – 1. Assignment of the expert opinion

Together with the Faculty of Civil Engineering at Brno University of Technology, we have produced a podcast miniseries dedicated to new candidates for the expert stamp. The podcast features 4 members or chairmen of the examination committees, doc. Zdeněk Dufek, doc. Tomáš Krabec, Dr. Lukáš Dřínovský and a member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, who is the author of the new expert witness procedure. The expert procedure is intended to improve the reviewability of expert reports. All four experts are prominent personalities in the field of Czech expert witnessing with unique experience.

You can already listen to the first episode on Spotify and YouTube.

17. 9. 2024

The guidelines of Prosecutor General´s Office

A member of our institute, Dr. Závora, has been involved in consulting on the guidelines of commissioning of sample questions for psychiatric experts in criminal proceedings, prepared by the Prosecutor General´s Office. The methodology is of particular importance when commissioning expert reports in the field of health care, branch of psychiatry, which are to address the issue of the offender’s sanity. The aim of the guidelines is to improve the practice of law enforcement authorities and psychiatric experts in the performance of their expert activities.

29. 8. 2024

European Council for High Ability (ECHA) Conference

At the end of August, the 19th European Council for High Ability (ECHA) Conference took place in Thessaloniki. At the conference, the lead author, Jana Pleskotová, presented a case study of a ten-year-old boy with exceptional ability. The co-authors were members of the Institute, Hana Sirotková and Jiří Závora. The poster was well received. Among other conference participants, our poster caught the attention of the president of ECHA and the organisers of the next ECHA 2025 conference to be held in Karlstad. Thanks to Jana for a great representation!

26. 8. 2024

A unique study on the causes of juvenile delinquency

Members of our institute, Dr. Závora and Mgr. Skořepa, are co-authors of a recently published study in an impacted scientific periodical. The study deals with a case of delinquent behavior of an adolescent in whom the usual causes of such behavior are not present. This is a long-term project of our institute to publish two thematically similar case studies (a boy and a girl). This is a unique qualitative research study that explores the experiences of children from otherwise functional families and environments who nevertheless engage in extensive delinquent behaviors. The most difficult part of the research is to find these extremely specific cases and understand this specific experience.

6. 5. 2024

Award for the best law journal in the Czech and Slovak Republics

The scientific law journal AUCI (SCOPUS) is competing for the award of the best law journal in CZ and SK. A member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, last year published in AUCI a theoretical study on the new principle of reviewability of expert evidence, which he authored. Structural evidence was inserted into the current regulation of expert evidence on the basis of a study from 2017, which Dr. Závora prepared at the request of the Ministry of Justice.

30. 4. 2024

Dr. Jiří Závora lectured on expert witness procedure at the Faculty of Law of Charles University

A member of our Institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, lectured on the procedure of an expert according to the new regulation of expert activities in the fields of psychology and identification of the writer at the Faculty of Law of Charles University. The lecture took place within the course of forensic expert witnessing, which is conducted by JUDr. Martin Richter, Ph.D. from the Department of Criminal Law of the Faculty of Law of Charles University.

23. 4. 2024

Lecture for students of the Law Faculty of Charles University

A member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, lectured students of the Faculty of Law of Charles University on the issues of the expert’s procedure in the current regulation of expert activities.

18. 4. 2024

Workshop for officials of the Ministry of Justice

A member of our institute, Mgr. Hana Sirotková, led a workshop for officials of the Ministry of Justice, Insolvency Department and the Department of Court Experts and Interpreters on 18 April. The workshop focused on mapping the strengths of individuals and using them within the team.

4. 4. 2024

Meeting of the Advisory Council of the Ministry of Justice

A member of our Institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, was an invited guest at the meeting of the Advisory Board for Economics of the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic. The discussion was held on the issues of the application of the expert’s procedure in the economic sectors of expertise.

27. 3. 2024

Educational event for expert psychiatrists

Members of our institute, Dr. Závora and Mgr. Skořepa, participated in an educational event of the Judicial Academy for psychiatric experts. The key topic was the reviewable procedure of the expert in solving professional questions concerning the sanity of offenders. The main speakers were Dr. Pleva and Dr. Tejnská from the NSZ.

20. 3. 2024

Dr. Jiří Závora was examing new applicants for expert authorization at the Ministry of Justice

A member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, was testing new applicants for expert authorization as a methodologist at the Ministry of Justice for the fourteenth time. This time it was in the field of fire protection. This extremely important forensic field was represented in the examination committee by Doc. Ing. Petr Kučera, PhD. and the other member of the commission Mgr. Radek Kislinger.

You can find an animation and training on the expert witness procedure on our YouTube channel.

5. 2. 2024

We provided an interview on the causes of poor quality work of forensic experts

The media image of Czech experts is shaped by highly problematic cases, but many experts in the Czech Republic are doing top-notch work, said in an interview for Seznam Zprávy given by members of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora and Mgr. Bohdana Nováková.

24. 1. 2024

VUT Brno – training of experts of the Faculty of Civil Engineering

A member of our institute, Dr. Jiří Závora, gave an invited lecture at a top expert workplace, Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering. The topic of the lecture was of course related to the procedure of an expert according to the new legal regulation of expert activities in the Czech Republic.

21. – 23. 9. 2023

Internship for the University of Amsterdam

For the students of the Master Forensic Science programme we arranged a three-day internship which included lectures on the new regulation of expert performance in the Czech Republic (Dr. Závora), on the interdisciplinary project on speaker identification (Mgr. Skořepa) and on the falsity of expert opinion in the decision-making practice of courts in the Czech Republic (Mgr. Nováková).

23.5.2023

The Judicial Academy, Kroměříž

Dr. Jiří Závora held a lecture for the judges of the Kralovehradecky region in Kroměříž on the structural concept of reviewability in the new regulation of expert performance

April 2023

Workshop on signature verification for the Czech National Bank

March 2023

Study on the interpretation of the meaning of the codified expert procedure according to the new regulation

Dr. Jiří Závora published a study in the prestigious law journal AUCI (SCOPUS) in which he interpreted the broader meaning of the structural concept of the reviewability of expert’s report. The codification of the expert’s procedure (§ 52 Regulation No. 503/2020 SB) and the requirements of an expert’s report (§ 41 Regulation No. 503/2020 SB) was based on Dr. Závora’s study published in 2017.

November 2022

Jerome’s Days

Participation in the panel discussion Interpreter is also just a person – Ethical, professional and psychosocial risks of the interpreting profession

June 2022

The Judicial Academy, Kroměříž – training course for judges

Procedure of the expert according to the new regulation of expert performance

June 2022, Justiční areál Na Míčánkách

The Judicial Academy – mental care for interpreters

Mental care for Ukrainian language interpreters

November 2021 – March 2022

Cooperation with Czech National Bank

Workshop: Training for bank tellers – comparing signature with the signature specimen

October 2021

Echo24.cz

Comment on President Miloš Zeman’s signature on the document convening the session of the Chamber of Deputies

New legal regulation of expert performance

The previous legal regulation of expert performance did not provide sufficient conditions for the expert report assessment. Based on the assignment of the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic, a study proposing a structure-based expert procedure was formulated by a member of our institute Dr. Jiří Závora.

Institute of Forensic Sciences Prague – justification is essential…